Sound Off!

Extremely fascinating write-up. I found you on Google if you were questioning. Thanks for sharing and I wish you remain to discuss on this topic as I believe numerous of your readers will take pleasure in much more content around this topic in the future.

Pueblo judges are vicious against women. I had to have three serious operations, was dealing with cancer, and the judges said I could have not time for them or healing. The cases continued. David Crockenberg,now a judge represented Parkview Hospital where I was molested and raped.He intimidated and blocked me from discovery along with Pat Kogovsek of Parkview and the wife of the city-county attorney. Judge Reyes would do nothing. The DA would do nothing. MY brain was injured by an underage driver.Seizures for life. Judge Rayes would not let the jury hear the case and gave a judgment to me. My car was in front. With the higher courts it was the same thing. I think the Pueblo mob owns the judicial system. The Constitution and Statutes and Civil Rights do not exist in Colorado Courts. I have all of the truth and proof and still it makes no difference. They have tried taking my home and my belongings. I am told that judges are paid off to throw cases. Before court while I sat waiting for court to begin the attorney for the other side went into the judges office to talk. I complained. The judge would not let me speak in court and gave me a judgment. Total corruption. This happened twice. Judge Maes is gone-he was corrupt. Now we have Judge Eyler and she is no better. Just like the man here with 71 felonies who got off–we are all being abused by bought off judges.

Judge Donna Schmalberger has ignored 3 void judgments issued by the Colorado appeals court. She is closing public hearings and has violated freedom of the press and freedom of speech. She has kicked out media from two hearings that gained media awareness. she ignores best interest of the child standard and colludes with cps/dhs to kidnap children for federal funding. She took the advice from child counselor Kris Newland to terminate because of “trauma bond”. Kris Newland NEVER saw me with my child! in fact. the only time I have been allowed to see my child in the last 4 years the psychologist testified that he saw no fear or trauma and recommended full reintegration. Judge schmalberger reterminated right after hearing that testimony. Both terminations have been voided by higher courts and Judge Schmalberger refuses to recuse herself. She said on the record on July 14 that she knew I was being tortured for the last 6 years! REMOVE THIS JUDGE FROM THE BENCH!!!! UGLYJUDGE.COM

“A justice or judge must possess the confidence of the community and therefore be independent and honest.”
~ The Honest Judge Amendment

I just read that on another website. Within Judge Tim Tow III’s final orders in my case he states that I failed to appear at a hearing which is why he ruled in favor of my x-husband. I called his clerk today and the first sentence in the transcript for that particular hearing date reads: Petitioner and Respondent appear pro-se. Honesty must have been thrown out of the above statement in Adams County Court. I thought Judges took an oath of ethics??

An attorney tried to put a ballot initiative forward this year that would require judges to be tried in front of a public ethics committee instead of behind closed doors. (where NO judge has ever been removed) He was threatened by members of the Colorado Supreme Court that unless he puled the initiative, they would pull his license. Everyone in the judicial department takes their example from the top and sadly, the majority there is still corrupt and shameless.

This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger.
I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your magnificent posts. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!

http://www.landandwaterusa.com/articles_GNL/2012_articles/11-27StacyLynn/swornaff11232012-3.pdf

VOTE NO ON JUDGE KUNZE-FIELD

EXPOSE OUR CORRUPTION AND WE’LL STEAL YOUR CHILD
excerpt:
The triumvirate consisting of former Colorado Governor Bill Ritter, Judge Julie Field and Pat Stryker’s ICLEI interests have been involved in a series of “amazing coincidences”, which culminated in the neutralization of Stacy Lynne as their main ICLEI/Agenda 21 opponent. This was accomplished by the stealing of Lynne’s son in one of the biggest miscarriages of justice ever witnessed in a family court. All three parties are inextricably tied to ICLEI/Agenda 21 interests.

“Of non-attorneys responding to the survey, 96% recommended retaining, 2% not to retain, and 2% made no recommendation. (These percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.)

Judge Field’s docket consists of 50% criminal cases, 40% civil cases and 10% domestic relations cases.”

APPLES AND ORANGES – HALF OF THIS JUDGE’S CASES ARE CIVIL. DEFENDANTS WERE NOT FAIRLY REPRESENTED IN THE PERFORMANCE REVIEWS.

Horrible Judge, Makes his mind, then writes his opinion.
Doesn’t review the material.
Heavily biased.
I appealed him to Colorado Supreme Court….
I could spend a long time telling you about him, but my supreme court petition does a good job:
look under: district court errors for the whole story:

https://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/235571857

case docs: https://www.scribd.com/mobile/users/tonydenvercolo/collections/5067591

The brief that went to Horton: https://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/235753929

if these dont work or display incorrectly, please search google for: 14sc520

also: pretty linient on child porn case:http://www.billoreilly.com/show?action=viewTVShow&showID=3764

Tony Massey

Judge Charles Pratt.
One else need be said about Judge Pratt than the 5 affidavits from litigants that were before him chastising his behavior. Most egregious is his removal of litigants jury fees and jury demands on multiple occasions. The Judicial Performance Commission has decided on its’ own to support him with rogue reviews that do not reflect the majority opinions. It is not the Judicial Commissions themselves, but the Director Kent Wagner and his minions. Following are two instances of his bias in preparing reviews: 1. In Boulder County, Judge Moore received a “do no retain” from the Commission despite her excellent record. It was later found out that only defense attorneys were given review forms. Not a single DA in Stan Garnett was given a review to fill out; but Mr. Garnett thereafter wrote reviews of his own giving her an A+. Mr. Wagner passed it off as an “Anomaly”. I had a statistical sample professor from DU do a calculation on what the odds would be of have 127 reviews received and not one of them was from a DA? The answer, 7 Billion to 1. Even after he was informed of the discrepancy, he failed to rectify the situation. Another example is in Judge Pratt’s review. He arbitrarily skipped two years of reviews out of six. Yet Mr. Wagner can point to no where in the statute that allows him to do that. Additionally, they did not send out reviews to any pro-se litigants. His latest excuse for that is that they have an unpublished rule that exempts such litigants as those in a rule 120 hearing from receiving a review. The Judicial Performance Evaluation Director and his office is doing everything possible to arbitrarily protect some judges while crucifying others. All of this is at the expense of the public who are being corruptly coaxed into voting for judges that instead should be disbarred; and persuaded from voting from other judges that have done nothing other than get sideways with someone up the judicial pecking order.
I would ask you vote no on Judge Pratt and all other judges being considered for retention until such time as the process is fixed and transparent. For a complete 60 pg report on the judicial performance commission please email me at JUDICIALPERFORMANCEREVIEW@GMAIL.COM.

I want people to be aware that their are judges through the District Court (s) in Colorado that make ruling in the division of “mental health”, such as Judge Phelps and Judge Murphy. I do not believe their is enough true transparency – “privacy” used as a means to deny true justice and scrutiny, adequate means of voting these judges out of their office, as well as violations of civil and religious rights that have taken place without acknowledgment and just due process. The basis for this type of court branch and its ability to order forced drugging/”medications” and confinement upon people (legal in Colorado) because of its adoption of largely secular and so called “science” that elevates these paradigms above other basis and practices, as well as choices the people should be given, has led to the deaths of people who were court ordered under these types of courts – division. There are areas of our court system that use privacy as means to covertly and unjustly silence, not acknowledge and trespass people’s rights and freedoms in very tyrannical ways and means. Other means of help for people is not being adequately given as choices with financial backing in the current medical-legal-enforcement- financial/insurance industries/mechanisms such as places that use natural means of health and healing. The promotion of licensed professionals, including lawyers and doctors, has increased so much and in such a manner to deny the real consideration of root realities that are never given their due attention and real justice in many of our court rooms and judges orders.
One avenue for complaints to change the judicial system for the better and remove judges as well, that might be effective is at http://www.coloradojudicialperformance.gov/index.cfm under “public comments”. If these two judges (named above) are listed on any ballots either this election or in future ones, please vote not to retain!!!!!!!

Please do NOT RETAIN Judge Cheryl Rowles-Stokes, 18th District Arapahoe County Court Judge. I personally witnessed her violate a defendant’s constitutional right to face his accuser, play extremely “fast and loose” with the law, as well as her complete disregard of facts! She shows absolute bias, allows DA’s to “lie and wait” during trials. The second a defendant walks into her courtroom, she views him as guilty and it shows! She abuses her authority and is on a constant “power trip” waiting for any opportunity to “show you who’s boss”!

Judge Michelle Amico came to the 18th Judicial as a former Denver Prosecutor. In Family Court Judge Amico maintained her demeanor as a prosecutor toward parents, especially many fathers. Judge Amico made rulings without hearing from both parties. Judge Amico did not require evidence. She has convicted loving parents and removed or limited their parenting time based soley on hearsay and without the need to hear from the other party.

One prominent Arapahoe County Family Law Firm stated that Judge Amico has caused more havoc and damage to families in her first term on the bench than they have ever seen any Judge accomplish. I myself witnessed Judge Amico in action on many occasions. Judge Amico has a habit of pointing her finger at families in the viewing area and yelling at them when she has been told hearsay from the other party. She does not allow the accused to defend themselves. She judges them and sanctions them.

Judge Amico was told by a mother that the dad might take their child out of state with less than 30 days notice. Without giving the dad the opportunity to respond and say absolutely no, this was not his plan, Judge Amico took the child after they had shared 50/50 joint custody for nearly a decade. She only allowed supervised visits. The attorney representing the dad said he had never seen a Judge act like this in court. He told that dad that he believed that Judge Amico would not listen to him. The attorney stated that he had never seen such a mean presentation by a Judge. Because the attorney had to work with the Judge in the future he stated that he feared her and he would not challenge her.

Judge Amico has not allowed due process in many family custody cases. Judge Amico cannot continue as a prosecutor of families who are going through difficult custody disputes.

Since September 28, 2014, nearly 800 VOTE NOT JUDGE AMICO SIGNS HAVE BEEN STOLEN from the 18th Judicial District. One eye witness observed a man in a black pick up truck with license plate #CO 787 RJL stealing VOTE NO JUDGE AMICO SIGNS on three separate occasions. He has pictures of this man.
1. How is this man connected to Judge Amico?
2. How did someone know not to take the signs across the street from the Arapahoe County Justice Center until Oct. 14? While all other signs near the Justice Center were removed earlier.
3. The value of the signs stolen is over $2100. This is a Class 4 Felony with a jail sentence of up to one year and a $2500 fine.
4. If Judge Amico was a party to this crime she will be charged as a co-conspirator to a Class 4 Felony Theft.
STEP DOWN JUDGE AMICO!!! You are not above the law!
~~From the VOTE NO JUDGE AMICO Committee

THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT . . . “POLITICIANS IN BLACK ROBES.” (AS IT TURNS OUT.)

For decades I refused to believe it, but it is now incontrovertibly established. The Colorado Supreme Court is indisputably a political actor. Our Colorado Supreme Court exists to serve Colorado political parties. At present, the Colorado Supreme Court is more rightly considered an adjunct of the Colorado Legislative Branch, than a check on the Colorado Legislative Branch. Rather than “truth-seeking,” the Colorado Supreme Court now sees its role as “political-outcome seeking.” Litigants successfully use the Colorado Supreme Court to achieve political purposes. In the Ralph Carr Justice Center, rather than meeting impartial guardians of the law, litigants meet their political allies on the bench.

“I think there are many who think of judges as politicians in robes. In many states, that’s what they are.” “They seem to think judges should be a reflex of the popular will.”

Sandra Day O’Connor

In this article, I provide an example of the political and partisan role of the Colorado Supreme Court. I describe a case in which the Colorado Supreme Court summarily erases billions of dollars of debt owed by Colorado state and local governments. That is, one branch of Colorado state government relieves another branch of Colorado government of its legal debts.

The case involves Colorado statutory contracts that create financial obligations on the part of Colorado governments. Over decades, political considerations induced the Colorado Legislature to mismanage those financial obligations. In recent years, the terms of those statutory contracts were deemed politically inconvenient and politically unpopular. The Legislative Branch asked the Colorado Supreme Court to discard the contracts.

In 2010, the Colorado Legislative Branch requested that the Colorado Supreme Court grant this political favor by ignoring the Contract Clause of the US Constitution, ignoring the history of legislative mismanagement of these state financial obligations, and relieving Colorado governments of their accrued legal debts.

In this article, I address the Colorado Supreme Court’s lack of independence, integrity, and impartiality. I provide a brief history of the efforts of the Colorado Legislature and the Colorado Supreme Court to escape Colorado governmental financial obligations. I comment on the recent (October, 2014) Colorado Supreme Court Decision itself, which summarily erased these billions of dollars of Colorado public sector debt. I highlight some of the numerous factual and logical errors that exist in the Colorado Supreme Court’s Decision in the case. I express incredulity at the Colorado Supreme Court’s willful ignorance of public pension administration, knowledge that was necessary to any court claiming to “seek truth” in the case.

My intent in writing this article is to enhance the public record of, and further document, what I consider to be one of the greatest “crimes” in Colorado history.

Visit the following link for the complete article:

http://coloradopols.com/diary/64487/the-colorado-supreme-court-politicians-in-black-robes-as-it-turns-out

I had a very negative experience with 4th Judicial District (El Paso County) District Judge, Honorable Barbara L. Hughes in 2010, and found her to be either corrupt and/or incompetent.

In the summer of 2010, while Judge Hughes was still a Magistrate in the El Paso County District Court, she heard a case for Emergency Guardianship for 10-year-old twin girls that was initiated by their paternal grandmother. This “Emergency Guardianship” was nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt by their paternal grandmother to take custody away from their mother and father, who were separated, and shared joint custody of the girls.

Magistrate Hughes “fact-finding” had no basis in factual data. Magistrate Hughes awarded visitation rights to the paternal grandmother (who had not lived in the state of Colorado in the previous 24 months, and was staying at a Colorado Springs hotel during the proceedings). Magistrate Hughes ordered the appointment of a Guardian ad litem for the girls (which could not be fulfilled because a Guardian ad litem can only be appointed in Dependency and Neglect cases, which this was not). The mother of the twin girls refused to comply with the visitation order, due to concerns over the mental stability of the paternal grandmother. Magistrate Hughes charged the mother with contempt of court – for not allowing her children to stay in a hotel room with paternal grandmother and paternal great-grandmother, neither of which were residents of the state of Colorado.

Several months, and tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees later, the mother of the children has a contempt of court citation on her permanent record, and the maternal grandmother (me) has a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and 25 years of good credit destroyed due to legal fees. This “case” should have never been heard in any Colorado Courtroom.

Judge Hughes should not be retained. She is most likely one of our previous Governor’s (Bill Ritter) left-wing cronies.

Would love to understand WHY Broomfield Judge Amy Bockman is allowed to profit from and continue to give illegal/unreasonable AND completely unrealistic sentences

I felt compelled to make a posting here as I am absolutely astonished by the comment on 1/25/15 from Makassa Jones regarding Judge Randall Arp. My divorce/child custody case experience in front of Judge Arp is completely different and quite frankly, just appalling.

He reviewed the evidence and facts of my case WITH prejudice. He WAS persuaded by fast talk, NOT the facts of the case. In the end, even though Judge Arp said it was NOT in the Best Interest of the Child, he ruled/ordered that my child (a 3 year old little girl at the time) be removed and ripped away from me immediately to live 5,000 miles away in Sweden. As expected, The Court of Appeals fully REVERSED and REMANDED Judge Arp’s ruling based on Error of Law and Abuse of Discretion. After the Appellate Court ruling, Judge Arp refused to have another hearing or bring my daughter back home where she belongs. I am awaiting now a ruling from the Appellate Court on my second appeal. If Judge Arp had no qualms about sending my child 5,000 miles away merely for the asking, he could do the same thing to any other father. Judge Arp is not morally fit to be on the bench as he believes it is perfectly fine to take away little girls from their father and send them 5000 miles away to live permanently. Judge Arp must be removed or be forced to resign.

Just got out of Judge Cisneros court room. I knew I was screwed when I watched her grill a man for 15 minutes when all she was doing was approving a child support agreement the parties had already agreed to in writing, and several times verbally to her.

Now, I admit that I stopped paying my spousal support when I could no longer afford it, and am 19 months behind, however, this was a child support hearing. My ex is pretty clearly under-employed (she is making less than 25% of the median income for her job, and is in fact 30% of the state average for that job with someone of her experience). She worked for the guy she sleeps with until she asked for a modification, and now works for one of his buddies. All I expected was that the standard that would be applied to me would be reasonably and fairly applied to her. I was asking for my ex to be imputed 35% of median, which was 50% of the average for that job and experience. Far less that I would be imputed in the same circumstances.

I make a good income, but my ObamaCare compliant policy is $1600/mo for myself and my kids, and my tax burden almost doubled in the last 4 years. Judge Cisneros was incredulous that my health care cost was so high, and made me justify every line-item. She refused to believe that I could not “find a lower cost policy”. I explained that I could, but the deductibles would be several times higher, and neither I nor my ex could afford that. She again made me justify several line items (additional emergency room expense coverage, long term hospital coverage, etc).

Judge Cisneros refused to consider that my ex was not seeking employment at the level she is capable of (and has worked at before). She gave total credence to my ex’s statements that she couldn’t work in her previous industry (web design) without any evidence, and refused to give my statements any credence “because I was no longer on the stand”, even though my ex acknowledged that I am far knowledgeable than her in IT.

Finally, the judge, who didn’t like my comment on the increased cost of health insurance due to ObamaCare or my offer to provide my cancellation notices from my previous policies, and who had decided the instant she heard I was behind on spousal support, decided that she was going to make an example of me, stating she was going to award my ex $2800/mo of my $3800/mo take home pay.

After consulting with the Child Support Services lawyer, she graciously lowered it to $2050/mo. I now have enough to pay my morgage and buy groceries, OR pay my car and insurance, gas, groceries and cell phone. My mortgage is $1500/mo, but renting an appropriate 3BR house or apartment in Colorado Springs will be at least $1200, so that really isn’t an option.

Bottom line, Judge Cisneros, through her annoyance at my bad decision and my political beliefs, decided my ex needed almost $4200/mo take home with no mortgage, and that I only need $1800 even though I have to pay the mortgage on the home my ex still owns half of (by the divorce order).

I understand her desire to punish me for being behind on spousal support, but any rational person can easily concede that this is far beyond punishment and well into abuse.

Finally, she closed by stating that if I fail to pay, or commit the egregious act of explaining to my 14 and 12 year olds why I may lose the house (which she would consider contempt of the divorce order requiring me to keep it current), she WILL throw me in jail.

This woman should not be a judge. She shouldn’t be a supervisor, a manager, or a consultant. She likes the power of the bench, and is not afraid to abuse it if she thinks she needs to make a point. Even if it means forcing someone into a position that will cost them their job, their home, and ultimately access to their children.

I simply cannot meet the terms of her order, and will therefore end up in jail at some point. That will eliminate any option of continuing to make even 50% of what I make now, as the best paying jobs will no longer be available to me. How’s that for “justice”? Being “in the children’s best interest”?

Judge David Archuleta in Boulder is not fair and does not listen to both sides of the story. He should not be retained. He favors women and those not from the U.S.A. I think he gets bribes from people he is not ethical. Also, he does not like anyone who is conservatie and says that they don’t like Obama. This Judge should go ASAP, he has been there too long. I will do my best and vote this wanna be judge out and you can help me out by not to retain him if you live in Boulder County.

Colorado Family Went From An American Dream to A Probate Nightmare
July 10, 2015 Story by Robin
Edwin and Marion grew up in the United States and served our country during World War II. Marion worked in the war plant. Edwin was wounded in the Battle of the Coral Sea was one hundred percent disabled and so received a pension. They were married in 1950. Edwin and Marion raised 7 children. Marion worked for 20 years as supervisor of housekeeping at National Jewish Hospital and Lowry AFB. They purchased 6 properties, cars, and motorcycles from police auctions, and eventually owned the biggest antique car collection in Colorado (115 cars). They built an empire worth over 10 million dollars. Edwin and Marion planned carefully to preserve their legacy. They found an attorney in Denver who specializes in estate planning, who recommended a revocable trust, which could be amended during my father’s lifetime, and became irrevocable upon his death. This was to ensure our family followed his wishes and maintained control of his assets. The American Dream turned into a Probate Nightmare. Arapahoe Probate Court took our family trust. Judge Timothy Fasing was the judge. All assets were liquidated and monies paid to court officials and attorneys. All it takes is one arguing family member to contest your will or for you to become incapacitated! Your children’s college funds, businesses, properties, cars, family homes, prized possessions, everything gone! Your surviving parent, spouse, or your incapacitated family member can become a ward to probate. Court officials then take control of your loved one, often denying family visits. Your personal money is drained as you are forced to hire attorneys to defend what used to be yours. Your family can be evicted from their homes, your loved one isolated, held against their will, and medicated. Court officials can threaten you with contempt charges if you seek justice and you can be falsely accused even though you have done nothing wrong, restraining orders can be enforced while the legacy you built dwindles away.
If this happens to you there is very little you can do to stop it individually. This is why it is important to become active through groups like NASGA (National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse) Coffergroup.org (Coalition Of Families For Elder Rights) AAAPG.NET (Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardians) and
F.A.C.E.U.S. Families Against Court Embezzlement Unethical Standards http://www.faceus.org robin@faceus.org contact us info@faceus.org
Litigate, Liquidate, Isolate, Medicate, Steal the Estate, Not Hesitate, Celebrate!
Shame On You Probate!!

the mesa county dist attorney is corrupt!! its pretty sad when they listen to a complete liar, who worked with police. to set up a person , make flase statements.we had tapes of the person who made the charges, stateing that the police set on his couch and was laughting how they made up charges,the person who filed them did so becos no one would give him drug”s so now any thing we try to give as proff they say its no good we had 10 people who say that what hes being charged with is complete lies but they wont except them but the 3 liars that filed charges any thing they say is like gold. and all three have long crimal records!!the public deffender is worse than the da he should be bared from pratice

Judge Dubois for El Paso County 4th Judicial Court District, not only showed extreme bias in Divorce/Custody case, but has put a child in harm. During the hearings this Judge did gave preferential treatment towards the father/respondent, she listened to all of his claims, his praises of himself, his lies on the stand, and she asked him questions to help him along. This was a case where the mother had no choice but to work full-time because the father has an extreme personality disorder and refused to work full-time. The Judge ordered split custody, thereby taking the young child out of the loving and nurturing home he was in, and placed him in a home where the there is drug use and neglect.
On a second hearing, this same Judge dismissed evidence of the child being exposed to a drug and left the orders as is. The bias shown was against a battered and hard-working mom, who puts her child first, so to give a neglectful father more time to neglect his son. This is another case of woman-on-woman bias, bias against women who have no other good choice but to work. Due to this bias this small child has to deal with neglect, being exposed to drugs, parental alienation, and emotional abuse.

Have her sell you the vehicle.

we already pay the ownership tax on a trade in vehicle and we must also pay the full ownership tax on a new vehicle is this double taxation?