Clear The Bench Colorado helps Colorado voters “Know Your Judge” with substantive evaluations of judicial performance
“Know Your Judge” with substantive evaluations of judicial performance
(UPDATE: this article was also published as a Guest Commentary both online and in the Sunday, 19 October Denver Post print edition)
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.
— Abraham Lincoln
As Coloradans prepare to cast their ballots in the 2014 elections, despite being bombarded with political ads and mailers, MOST voters have little to no information on up to a third of the people asking for their vote: our state’s 3rd Branch of government, the judges.
The official, government-sanctioned incumbent-protection “performance reviews” produced by the state’s Commissions on Judicial Performance (published and disseminated, at significant taxpayer expense, in the “Blue Book”) fail to provide much (if any) substance behind the published “recommendations” (almost uniformly in favor of “retaining” judicial incumbents in office). In that respect, the Blue Book “reviews” are little more than (taxpayer-funded) political ads for incumbents.
The Commissions on Judicial Performance (groups of political appointees charged with evaluating and reporting on the job performance of judicial incumbents) routinely fail to actually evaluate judicial job performance or provide adequate information sufficient for voters to base a decision. Summarizing an incumbent’s resume and tabulating the results of surveys sent out to a select group of lawyers and other judges fails to answer the question posed to voters, “do they deserve another term – and why?”
As a Denver Post guest commentary by a former Judicial Performance commissioner noted,
There has been a failure of real performance evaluation and a lack of analytical content in the write-ups for the voters.
If narratives provide meaningful information about how a justice has decided cases, there will be accountability and the system will work as it is designed to do. Too often in the past, narratives have amounted to complimentary resumes instead of job performance evaluations. Some commentators and observers have denigrated the narratives as a “rubber stamp” exercise for retaining judges.
Why do we have political appointees (commissioners are appointed by the governor, attorney general, state legislators and the Chief Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court – the latter certainly seeming to have a conflict of interest) telling Coloradans how to vote?
Colorado voters deserve better information on these unelected officials, who (usually with little notice) exert enormous influence over their lives. For a third straight election cycle, Clear The Bench Colorado has researched and evaluated the performance of the appellate court (statewide) judges appearing on the 2014 ballot (2 Supreme Court justices, 2 Court of Appeals judges), collected inputs on district and county judges from around the state, and published this information in an easy-to-read “scorecard” format as a resource for Colorado voters.
Our courts rule on important issues that seriously impact all Colorado citizens, including:
- Elections and voting rights issues (including recent legislative election, special district election, and school board election cases)
- Tax increases without constitutionally-required voter approval (property taxes, vehicle registration taxes – er, “fees”, energy taxes, and the recent proliferation of taxes (er, “fees”) on shopping bags
- The right to start and run a business without needing government permission
- Free Speech issues (including both academic and political speech rights)
- School funding and school choice issues
- Self-protection or “gun” rights issues (including overturning an illegal ban on concealed-carry by the University of Colorado)
- Healthcare issues (including insurance coverage, medical records privacy and liability for malpractice resulting in death)
- Congressional and state legislative redistricting and reapportionment, setting Colorado’s legislative district boundaries for a decade and exerting tremendous influence over Colorado’s electoral destiny
View Clear The Bench Colorado’s Evaluations of Judicial Performance 2014 for substantive evaluations of judicial performance – to better “know your judges” before casting your vote this year. (http://www.clearthebenchcolorado.org/evaluations-2014/)
An invaluable service.
Very interested in data on judges and justices in Co and specifically Arapahoe Cty
I would really like to know what judges that are on the ballot are conservative as I refuse to vote for another liberal judge.
Please tell me where I can find the political party affiliation of the judges up for retention on the Colorado ballot. I do not want to vote to retain any democratic judges. I want the party affiliation only!!!!
Renee –
judges don’t list their party affiliation; they are officially unaffiliated (which is why the retention vote is a nonpartisan “yes” or “No” choice).
In any event, partisan affiliation is not an accurate predictor of performance or fealty to the rule of law.
Bottom Line: if a judge fails to uphold the constitution and follow the law, should they be a judge, or find another line of work?
Can you send the link to me that would suggest how I should vote for retention for each judge on the ballot this election? I haven’t been able to find that on your site. Do you have it simply stated somewhere? Thanks.
Kimberly –
Unlike the “official” government-sponsored commission “reviews” Clear The Bench Colorado does not insult your intelligence by telling you how to vote – but the following scorecards provide a substantive evaluations of the “work product” of the judges seeking your vote, presented in a scorecard format, to better inform your decision.
http://www.clearthebenchcolorado.org/evaluations-2014/
I would like to know the party affiliation of the judges and political activities that they have been involved in.
Michael –
judges don’t list their party affiliation; they are officially unaffiliated (which is why the retention vote is a nonpartisan “yes” or “No” choice).
In any event, partisan affiliation is not an accurate predictor of performance or fealty to the rule of law.
Colorado has had both very good, and very bad, judges appointed by governors of both parties.
Bottom Line: if a judge fails to uphold the constitution and follow the law, should they be a judge, or should they perhaps find another line of work?
It appears to be nearly impossible to get information on the judicial district and county judges in Colorado. The government-sponsored reviews are laughable. Every judge should be retained? Uh, ok. Waste of taxpayer money to compile these. I image there are many voters like me, who want to retain the good, fair judges but don’t know exactly how to accomplish this without hours of phone calls and research.
For those of you looking for more info on Judges please see the link I have posted. During my search, this has been the most informative as it seems nearly impossible to find out the judges affiliations. It will also show you who originally appointed the judge (most of them anyway).
http://judgepedia.org/Jefferson_County,_Colorado
Hi Justin –
Judgepedia is a decent site for background information on judges (we have them linked on the sidebar) but doesn’t provide much in the way of information about the actual performance of those judges on the bench. Still, in the absence of other information (and we simply lack the resources to investigate each of the 145 judges on Colorado’s 2014 ballot in depth) it can provide additional data some might find useful.
With judges nationwide working the radical conservative political agenda against the citizens in cases ranging from employee rights to rape, and obviously making decisions along party lines, I feel we all have a right to know what their political affiliation is, because that is the single biggest influence on their decisions, whether they will admit it or not. We have lower level judges trying to repeal Obamacare, forcing employees to do without birth control, ruling against gay marriages, all kinds of issues.
Alan, that’s certainly an interesting perspective.
Clear The Bench Colorado doesn’t rate judges according to their partisan affiliation (if any; many judges choose not to affiliate with a political party).
Rather, our evaluations focus on the actual performance of rated judges – and whether they uphold the Constitution, specifically, and the rule of law (in general).
However, if partisan affiliation is your criterion of choice, the following link may provide additional information:
http://judgepedia.org/Colorado
Ok.. So I have heard SEVERAL times that the “political affiliation” of these folks can “not” be attained & the “so called reason to it”.. SOooo, I do NO agree. There are several factors that must go into a “good practicing judge”, and political affiliation is ONE and the other is their faith? Do they even have a faith? I do would Not want to “vote” for an agnostic Or an atheist judge. As tax payers as I am sure ALL of us ARE – we have the RIGHT to know.
There are various factors which people might consider in evaluating judges.
Clear The Bench Colorado bases evaluations on actual judicial performance, without regard to political or religious affiliation.
In our experience, such affiliations are not an accurate indicator of actual performance on the bench.
Definitely is good to find great postings like this. I actually liked this.
This is the perfect way to break down this information
Not one of the other postings I’ve come across are like this one. You can tell a lot of work went into this.
Based on the number of responses, this is definately an extremely involved topic. Whenever I come back to this post there’s an interesting visitor post better than some of the earlier ones.
This truly demonstrates that you can still find individuals that value the things they submit online. I truly loved browsing the comments.
This wasn’t the site We were looking for but I’m glad I came across it. I see it’s very popular on the web. Good job.
This wasn’t the site We were looking for but I’m thankful I found it. I realize it is quite popular on the internet. Good job.
I must say that this really is one of many eye-catching posts I’ve found for this topic. I will definately keep an eye on your posts.
I think I checked out a different post similar to this one in before. It had the same content (different judges, different year) and is just as well posted.
I believe I actually checked out a different post like this one in the past. It had the exact same content (different judges, different year) and was equally well published.
I must say that this really is one of many exceptional postings I’ve found on this subject. I am going to definately keep an eye on your posts.
And this is what I consider beneficial content. Continue the great work.
There is no doubt that this write-up is probably the best I’ve found today. It’s also obvious the person who’s website this is put a whole lot of work into it. Good work!
Wonderful material when compared to most of the similar subject material I’ve read. Keep up the nice work.
This is extremely good subject material. One of the best subject material I’ve discovered at this time. Keep up the great work.
This wasn’t the site I was looking for but now I’m thankful I came across it. I see it’s very popular on the internet. Good job.
Very good material compared to many of the other topics I’ve checked out. Keep up the nice work.
It is always just so exciting to discover good information such as this with all the unnecessary content that’s out there. I mean, you can definitely tell that much time and patience with into this. Do you work with content writers or do you create your own material?
Content is what it’s about people and this is just what I call good content. The information here is both interesting and useful. This might make a terrific resource for someone looking for content ideas.
I have a website on this exact subject matter and I got to tell you, this is good stuff. It’s given me some additional ideas for my content that I would never have thought about. The person who wrote this is doing an outstanding job.
how do I find out what party these judges support are for before I vote….