nice of you to stop by; still guzzling the Kool-Aid, I see.

You have an odd definition of “tyrranical” - you would deny our 1st Amendment right to express an opinion on our “absurd” website about the blatantly unconstitutional rulings of an out-of-control judicial majority?

Are you in agreement with your ideological buddy State Senator Pat Steadman that advocating for the citizens of this state to exercise their right to vote in retention elections - our ONLY means of holding the judiciary accountable to the people - is “radical and disruptive?”

We would all like to think that our justices on the Colorado Supreme Court are “honorable” - unfortunately, the four justices scheduled for retention votes this year have repeatedly violated their oath to uphold our Constitution, as written.

Perhaps I have a different definition of “honorable” than yours - but for me, violating an oath - particularly THAT oath - does not meet that standard.

The only “bidding” I wish of our Supreme Court justices is that they honor their oath - as I have mine, both at home and overseas - to “uphold and defend” our Constitution.

Since the four justice asking to be retained have not met that standard - I continue to urge a “NO” vote in response to their request to keep their jobs.