Published by CTBC Director on 05 Jan 2010 at 04:11 am
How the Colorado Supreme Court is “Killing the Golden Goose” of Colorado’s Economic Prosperity
A recent report by Americans For Prosperity Colorado (Colorado in Transition: Killing the Golden Goose - A Report on Colorado’s Economic Future)
According to the Denver Post, the report “laid almost all the blame on Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter and the Democratic-controlled legislature.”
As usual, the Post doesn’t quite get the facts straight.
In the Post’s ongoing campaign to ignore the culpability of the Colorado Supreme Court in Colorado’s fiscal woes (and attempts to bury news about the Clear The Bench Colorado campaign to hold the unjust justices of the court accountable to the Colorado Constitution and the rule of law), the report’s frequent mention of “[r]ecent court decisions…” undermining the “biggest factor in protecting Colorado’s tax and spending climate from outside political pressures and runaway growth” (TABOR, the Taxpayers Bill of Rights) is left completely unremarked (fulfilling the Post’s unofficial mission of filtering, rather than reporting, the news).
In fact, the report specifically mentions the “Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to approve an increase in property tax rates without a vote of the people” as THE greatest single threat to “TABOR’s heretofore straightforward protections.” (p.6)
The report recommends a number of “[s]pecific proposals policy-makers should consider”, with several directly reversing actions of the Colorado Supreme Court, such as “reaffirming TABOR’s requirement that tax hikes be approved by voters” and acting to “rein in tax hikes masquerading as fees…” (p.7)
The definition of a fee has been abused. Many of these so-called fees are nothing more than tax hikes in disguise. During the 2009 legislative session alone, hundreds of millions of dollars in new fees were proposed and contemplated by the legislature. One, increasing vehicle registration fees by an average $41 per vehicle per year, was passed and signed by Governor Ritter. At $250 million per year, this “fee” will raise far more in new revenue than is warranted by the cost of administering the vehicle registration and licensing program. As such, it is really a tax increase. (p.21)
The Post article falsely characterizes the report’s summary of the increased cost of “vehicle registration fees” (Colorado Car Tax) as an “error”, asserting that the “fee increase is for only three years and in the third and final year the average Coloradan will pay $41 extra” (total). This assertion is uninformed at best, disingenuous at worst - the “fee” increases have already cost the average Coloradan $40-$50 extra in the first year of increases alone - as other (less-biased) journalists have reported, “the pain of FASTER is just beginning.”
Further addressing transportation policy, the AFP report notes that
“the number of dedicated sources for transportation funding has dropped by three with the repeal of Arveschoug-Bird and the elimination of the Senate Bill 1 (1997) and House Bill 1310 (2002) diversions. Gas tax revenues, car registration fees, and drivers license revenues remain, but with the 2009 passage of Senate Bill 228 dedicated transportation funding from the General Fund is cut.” (p.9)
The culpability of the Colorado Supreme Court in eliminating “dedicated sources for transportation funding” is less direct, but equally important. The General Assembly’s unconstitutional repeal of the Arveschoug-Bird 6% limit on General Fund spending growth with SB228 has NOT yet been challenged in court because, so long as the Mullarkey Majority controls the Colorado Supreme Court, “the fix is in” - no challenge, despite the legal merits, has any prospect of success before this agenda-driven court.
Other policy areas addressed by the report include Colorado’s Civil Justice Environment - with “the most important improvements Colorado should pursue” starting with:
1. The selection of sound judges: Ensuring fairness and predictability in civil justice necessitates good laws and good interpreters of the law. Outcome-based judicial decisions (rendering verdicts based on what the judge thinks the outcome should be instead of what the law says it should be) significantly jeopardize the stability and predictability of the tort environment. Instead of activist judges, the Governor should work to appoint judges committed to the philosophy of judicial restraint. (p.29)
What makes a good judge? was one of the first issues addressed by Clear The Bench Colorado.
The report also notes that the Ritter administration (and Colorado General Assembly) policies and legislation have increased the cost of health care in Colorado (above and beyond the massive pending Federal legislation) by (what else!?) imposing additional “fees” on insurance companies “by $13 million in 2009 and $30 million in 2010 with the approval of House Bill 1390” (p.33) - costs that will be passed on to Colorado consumers, courtesy of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling enabling the proliferation of “fees” to circumvent TABOR.
Finally, the report also recommends that Colorado “[t]ighten up laws regarding government condemnation of private property” (p.69) to defend Colorado citizens against eminent domain abuses (expanded by yet another Colorado Supreme Court ruling undermining our legal and constitutional protections, the “Telluride Land Grab” case).
The report is well worth reading in its entirety - but as this article (hopefully) makes clear, the Colorado Supreme Court is inextricably involved in “Killing the Golden Goose” of Colorado’s economic prosperity.
Don’t let your own goose get cooked! Exercise YOUR right to vote “NO” on the four ‘unjust justices’ of the Mullarkey Majority (Justices Michael Bender, Alex Martinez, Nancy Rice, and Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey) who need YOUR approval to continue taking away your constitutional rights: your right to vote on tax increases, your right to defend your homes and business from seizure by rapacious governments, and your right to enjoy the benefits of the rule of law, instead of suffering rule by activist, agenda-driven “justices.” Please help to support Clear The Bench Colorado with your comments (Sound Off!), your contributions, and your “NO” vote on retaining these unjust justices in 2010!
Tags: Alex Martinez, Americans For Prosperity, Colorado Car Tax, Colorado Constitution, Colorado Courts, Colorado Gun Tax, Colorado Judges, Colorado Legislature, Colorado Mill Levy, Colorado Smoking Ban, Colorado Supreme Court, Denver Post, eminent domain abuse, FASTER, judical activism, judicial accountability, judicial evaluation, judicial retention, judicial usurpation, Know Your Judge, Mary Mullarkey, Michael Bender, Mill Levy Tax Colorado, Mill Levy Tax Freeze, Mullarkey Court, Mullarkey Majority, Nancy Rice, Ritter Auto Tax, Ritter Candy Tax, Ritter Gun Tax, TABOR, Telluride Land Grab, unjust justices