Published by CTBC Director on 29 Oct 2009 at 09:09 am
“Clearing the Liberal Bench” - Mike Rosen’s Denver Post column promotes Clear The Bench Colorado
“The liberal majority on the Colorado Supreme Court has taken judicial chutzpah to a new level.”
Mike Rosen’s column in today’s Denver Post joins the rising chorus of commentators (Mark Hillman’s excellent article Wednesday, and Vince Carroll’s superb commentary Sunday, to name just the most prominent recent examples) speaking out against the Mullarkey Majority’s most recent blatantly unconstitutional ruling - and piling-on power grab - in Lobato v. State of Colorado last Monday.
As Rosen notes, “the level of education spending is inherently a budgeting and political question that must be considered in the context of competing demands from other essential services for finite revenues” - a question properly (and constitutionally) the domain of our elected (and accountable) legislators.
“Uh-uh, said the liberal Supremes, trumping the lower courts, we’re going to arrogate this power to the judiciary. Since simply spending more money on public schools doesn’t necessarily produce better results, this ruling implicitly gives courts the authority to also dictate what is taught and how.” (emphasis added)
This latest ruling is only the most recent example of the out-of-control Mullarkey Court’s grab for power - claiming the authority to be the ultimate arbiter of ALL political issues in Colorado, authority it does not have under the Colorado Constitution and the rule of law.
As Rosen points out, “the appointed members of the court… exploit unchecked power. Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey, the liberal-in-chief, has been there for 22 years.”
Blatant partisanship and arrogant judicial activism - advancing a political agenda by making law, not simply upholding it - is nothing new to the court’s liberals. In the past they’ve co-opted the legislature by imposing a Democrat-contrived redistricting plan on the state, and overrode TABOR when they conveniently declared Gov. Bill Ritter’s property tax increase a “freeze.”
Fortunately, there’s a remedy in Colorado for runaway judges like these. Unlike U.S. Supreme Court justices, Colorado jurists aren’t appointed for life.
Periodically, they must stand for a retention vote by the citizens. As benevolent coincidence has it, three of the four liberal activists who conspired in this ruling are up for retention in 2010: the aforementioned Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey along with Justices Alex Martinez and Michael Bender. (The fourth, Justice Gregory Hobbs, was retained in the last election for another 10-year term. Sorry.)
Rosen concludes: “Retention elections are usually a perfunctory formality. Judges are rarely voted off the bench. Perhaps this was the last straw, an opportunity to deliver a message to these and other would-be judicial activists.”
We are witnessing a slow-motion coup d’etat in Colorado by the Mullarkey Majority of the Colorado Supreme Court. In disregarding the proper judicial obligation to uphold the law (NOT to make policy), the Mullarkey Court, unrestrained, is seizing more and more power. When these unjust justices rule from the bench, they really RULE from the bench…
The 2010 Supreme Court retention elections must not be - cannot be - a mere “perfunctory formality.” Exercise your rights (while you still have them) - hold the unjust justices of the Mullarkey Majority accountable to the Colorado Constitution and the rule of law. Exercise YOUR right to vote “NO” on retaining the four unjust justices of the Mullarkey Majority (Justices Michael Bender, Alex Martinez, Nancy Rice, and Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey) who need YOUR approval to continue taking away your rights: your right to have policy decided by elected, accountable legislators (not unelected judges); your right to vote on tax increases; your right to defend your homes and business from seizure by rapacious governments; and your right to enjoy the benefits of the rule of law, not rule by activist, agenda-driven “justices.” Support Clear The Bench Colorado with your voice (Sound Off!), your contributions, and “NO” vote on retaining these unjust justices in 2010!
Tags: Alex Martinez, Colorado Car Tax, Colorado Constitution, Colorado General Assembly, Colorado Judges, Colorado Legislature, Colorado Mill Levy, Colorado Supreme Court, judical activism, judicial accountability, judicial evaluation, judicial retention, judicial usurpation, Know Your Judge, Mark Hillman, Mary Mullarkey, Michael Bender, Mike Rosen, Mill Levy Tax Colorado, Mill Levy Tax Freeze, Mullarkey Court, Mullarkey Majority, Nancy Rice, Rule of Law, school funding, Separation of Powers, TABOR, unjust justices, Vince Carroll
Yaakov Watkins on 29 Oct 2009 at 12:59 PM #
The Colorado Supreme Court is out of control. They need to be stopped.
Derec on 29 Oct 2009 at 2:23 PM #
Why is the Court involved in this issue since the Colorado Constitution clearly states education is the responsibility of the general assembly. In the issue of check and balances, we have the executive branch that’s the check here.
Cheryl on 29 Oct 2009 at 4:08 PM #
As Blackstone would say, the role of the judge is to discover the law and to state it more clearly, not to make the law. I’m of the persuasion that the matter of education is the responsibility of the parents and the church (I’m a homeschooling mother of three). However, Colorado, like the US, is guided by a certain constitution, and those who blatantly refuse to abide by it need to be voted out.
Crista Huff on 01 Nov 2009 at 9:55 AM #
Matt, You are in the top 1% of bulldog grassroots activists that I’ve met. I will find volunteers for you going into 2010. You are featured in my next newsletter. Keep on fighting the good fight! — Crista
t2action on 01 Nov 2009 at 11:38 AM #
Thanks clearthebenchcolorado.com for keeping the public informed and drawing attention to the mess we have in our own Supreme Court. We just made a donation and hope to see Colorado do some “spring cleaning” late next fall! These justices clearly do not understand what they were elected to do — it’s time to shut down the power grab as Mike notes in this article. Rather than a “perfunctory formality,” we plan to have a decisive disinfecting.
J Blakney on 15 Nov 2009 at 7:19 AM #
Thanks for your eye-opening presentation at Ladies for Liberty yesterday.
You may be interested in what is happening with the State Supreme Court in NY re: petitions for 9/11 visibility. They just received a denial from the State Supreme Court for a petition based request, the denial which is clearly in violation of the will of the people.
http://www.nyccan.org/
It would seem your two organizations could share strategy. They have done some significant fund raising. Also, the local C4L group has an email base of over 8000 and the state coordinator said our state rep’s ears really perk up when they hear that … Reach her through Liberty Loving Coloradans Meetup group. Our reps at least need to be on board enough to be conversant with your cause, IMHO.
Thanks for your continuing efforts and education of us all.