Published by CTBC Director on 09 Apr 2009 at 11:57 pm
Supreme Court Ruling Opens Door to Millions in New Taxes
The Colorado Supreme Court’s recent ruling to sanction Governor Bill Ritter’s backdoor tax increase on the people of Colorado (the so-called Mill Levy Tax “Freeze”) - overturning both the trial court who had found the tax increase unconstitutional and the will of the people, as previously expressed by rejecting a nearly-identical measure to freeze Colorado’s mill levy tax rates (Amendment 32) - was bad enough, costing Colorado taxpayers over $117 million this year alone.
BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE: additional language buried deep “in the middle of the 45-page opinion” opens the door to millions more - up to $2 Billion more - in additional taxes, without asking voters for their permission, as required by TABOR.
State Legislature staff lawyer Sharon Eubanks briefed the Joint Budget Committee “with her shocking analysis of [the] recent state Supreme Court decision, which she says gives legislators the right to raise taxes without a vote of the people.”
John Ziegler, staff director of the Joint Budget Committee, then provided legislators a list of several tax credits that were now “fair game” under the interpretation - totalling almost $2 Billion in potential “new” tax revenue. (Just for fun - review the list and see how many new taxes YOU might get to pay once the legislature puts them into effect (take the survey and/or post comments below). I tallied up 6-9 additional taxes I would have to pay, depending on how I spend my week - but I’m not a smoker (although I DO buy groceries, gas, use the internet, a cellphone, etc.).
Of course, if you are a smoker, it didn’t take long to become the first target for new taxes. Within a few short hours after hearing the legal analysis,
Outraged yet? You’re not alone. House Minority Leader Mike May, R-Parker, issued a “harshly worded statement” condemning the ruling:
Vince Carroll of the Denver Post editorial board weighed in with a scathing essay (Blowing the Lid Off TABOR) slamming the court:
Forgive them, for they know not what they do? Not so much. Sen. Al White, R-Hayden, indicates that the Supremes (particularly ueber-partisan Chief Justice Mullarkey, who wrote the opinion) knew exactly what they were doing:
Jon Caldara, president of the Independence Institute, expressed similar sentiments:
“The Supreme Court will back the Legislature if it wants to repeal tax credits…
Indeed - something’s got to be done.
Vote NO on retaining the four rogue Supreme Court justices - Mullarkey, Bender, Martinez, and Rice - in 2010.
Tags: Alex Martinez, Bill Ritter, Colorado, Colorado Constitution, Colorado Judges, Colorado Mill Levy, Colorado Supreme Court, Joint Budget Committee, judicial accountability, judicial evaluation, judicial retention, judicial usurpation, Mary Mullarkey, Michael Bender, Mill Levy Tax Colorado, Mill Levy Tax Freeze, Mullarkey Court, Mullarkey Majority, Nancy Rice, TABOR, Taxes, unjust justices
Wesley on 15 Apr 2009 at 9:33 am #
Collectively, the Colorado Supreme Court has about as much respect for the Colorado Constutition as they do for a roll of toilet paper. The four justices up for retention want to legislate? Fine. Then let’s throw them out and let them run for State House or State Sentate.
Bodacious Babe on 15 Feb 2010 at 9:53 am #
I used to live in Colorado (Lakewood) but now I live in Ohio. I thought Ohio’s Supreme Court was highly activist. Ours is nothing compared to Colorado. My heart and prayers go out to all of the good folks of Colorado. I read the blogs within this website and I was shocked. It’s headed for a dictatorship out there. This website is very appropriately named. And to think I found this website by accidentally clicking on the wrong spot. Good thing I did. I live in Ohio. I love Ohio. But I love Colorado a lot. Your wonderful state is beautiful. Your people are some of the nicest, sweetest folks that anyone would ever want to meet. Colorado residents don’t deserve to be “represented” like this. Good luck in your endeavours as you look to the future to get rid of partisan nonsense in your Supreme Court.